|
10
September 2005
Reference: Mr. Gi Estrada, APMM Coordinator for
Taiwan
Asia Pacific Mission for Migrants, No. 2 Jordan Road, Kowloon,
Hong Kong SAR
Tel. (852) 2723-7536; Fax (852) 2735-4559; Email: apmm@hknet.com
Migrants
Cry Out: Don't Bleed Us Dry, Stop Extorting Fees on Us!
The
revelation made by Taiwan?s Council of Labor Affairs (CLA)
that what the foreign workers pay as service fee is actually
a management fee only shows that the CLA is biased towards
the employers and the brokers. It does not give a damn to
the rights and welfare of the migrants.
The CLA made this
revelation on September 6 when it conducted a dialogue
with NGO's. This meeting was called by the CLA in the wake
of the recent Thai MRT workers uprising in
Kaohsiung because of their poor working and living conditions.
The CLA has attributed
this to the poor management of their broker firm. This
has caused a huge uproar in Taiwan on how migrant workers
are treated and resulted also in CLA chairperson Chen Chu
to resign her position by taking blame on the incident.
Essentially,
the management expenses are being charged to the foreign
workers to entice employers? especially local and foreign
manufacturers to invest in Taiwan. This is because the pay
of the migrants is lower and the management?s responsibility
and accountability of these employers are being passed on
to the brokers. Practically, migrants in Taiwan are being
used as sacrificial lambs for the greedy big corporations
and are offered as incentives to local and foreign businesses.
In effect, the CLA favors and protects the interests of
the employers especially the big ones owned by local and
foreign capitalists rather than in ensuring protection for
the foreign workers. It is thus very clear that the labor
import policy of Taiwan is geared in using the migrants
to work in the dirty, difficult and dangerous jobs and to
serve the greedy interests of foreign and local corporations
to earn super profits.
This was very clearly illustrated
in the Thai workers uprising in Kaohsiung on August 21.
What were highlighted were the inhuman and unjust policies
of the brokers and the corruption relating to the hiring
of such business entity? What was left out or not given prominence
was that the broker in effect was the employers? instrument
in controlling its workers so that they would not dare complain.
The employer exploited its own workers by not paying the
migrants fully for their overtime work and for letting them
pay the management fee, which should be shouldered by them
in the first place.
The CLA should not only reexamine its
policy of letting the migrants pay for their employers
management expenses but should totally abolish this practice.
Employers especially of big firms should fully shoulder these
costs.
On the other hand employers of individual caretakers
and domestic workers should not shoulder the management
fee in the guise of brokers fee as they are already paying
the brokers NT$25,000 - NT$30,000 a year. If the CLA insists
otherwise it would look very clearly that they are only
protecting the brokers' interests. We also call on the governments
of sending countries to make sure that this absurd policy
be stopped. We will mobilize the migrant workers to ensure
that this be carried out.#
|